Cases stall before design starts when the scan has a problem: motion artifacts, missing or obscured margin data, an incomplete opposing arch, bad or missing bite registration, or debris and moisture. Checking those five points before sending a case avoids most clarifying questions and delays.
A case that comes back with clarifying questions instead of a finished design isn't a sign of a slow designer — it's almost always a sign the scan had a problem that needed flagging before design could start responsibly. Here's what causes that, so it's easier to catch before the case is even sent.
Motion artifacts
Scanning too quickly, or losing tracking mid-scan and resuming, can distort surface geometry in ways that aren't obvious at a glance. These artifacts are especially costly around the margin, where precision matters most and a distortion is easiest to miss.
Missing or obscured margin data
If the margin is subgingival and wasn't adequately retracted or captured, the finish line simply isn't in the scan data to work from. A designer can infer a reasonable margin from surrounding geometry, but inference is not the same as an accurate scan, and it introduces risk that a retake would have avoided entirely.
Incomplete opposing arch
Occlusion can't be checked properly without a full, accurate opposing arch. A partial or low-quality opposing scan means occlusal contacts are being estimated rather than verified — exactly the kind of gap that produces a high spot the patient discovers at delivery.
Bad or missing bite registration
Without a bite registration that seats cleanly, there's no reliable way to relate the prep arch to the opposing arch in the correct position. This is one of the more common reasons a case gets flagged rather than designed straight through.
Debris or moisture interference
Saliva, blood, or debris on the prep at scan time can create false surface data that looks like real anatomy but isn't. It's usually catchable on close review, but it's easy to miss if the scan is only checked at a glance.
The fastest fix isn't better software — it's a two-minute review before the scan is sent. Checking margin visibility, opposing arch completeness, and bite registration before a case ships catches most of these issues at the source.
What a good design partner does when a scan has a problem
Flags it and asks before proceeding, rather than guessing and delivering a design that may not fit. A short delay for a clarifying question is a much smaller cost than a design that comes back for revision, or worse, gets missed entirely and shows up as a remake.