Decide between hiring a CAD designer and outsourcing by looking at your volume pattern, not your current backlog. A backlog says something is wrong now; it doesn't say whether you need a permanent hire or flexible capacity. Steady high volume favors hiring, while variable volume favors outsourcing.
Most labs don't decide between hiring and outsourcing with a framework — they decide under deadline pressure, after a backlog has already formed. Here's a more structured way to think about it, before you're in that position.
Look at your volume pattern, not your current backlog
A backlog tells you something's wrong right now. It doesn't tell you whether the fix is a permanent hire or a flexible capacity valve — and that distinction is the whole decision.
What a hire actually costs beyond salary
Recruiting time, onboarding and training on your specific standards, benefits, equipment and software licensing, and the ramp-up period before a new designer is running at full speed — all of this is real cost that a straight salary comparison leaves out. It's not a reason to avoid hiring; it's a reason to be honest about what the comparison actually is.
These aren't mutually exclusive, permanent choices. Plenty of labs run a stable in-house team for their steady volume and use an outsourced partner for overflow, new case types, or unfilled-role coverage — the framework is about matching the tool to the specific gap, not picking one model forever.
The honest question to ask yourself
Would this volume still justify a full-time hire in six months, or is it solving a problem that's really about this quarter? If you're not sure, that uncertainty is itself the answer — a flexible, no-commitment option costs you nothing to test while you find out.